Mixed trend on the daily chart: below its 200-day average, above its 50-day · 50-day below the 200-day · SuperTrend up since Nov 4 · below the Ichimoku cloud · RSI 60 · MACD above its signal
| 35.67 | 52-week high | +148.40% |
| 16.19 | R3 (classic) | +12.72% |
| 15.71 | Previous month high | +9.40% |
| 15.43 | R2 (classic) | +7.47% |
| 14.90 | R1 (classic) | +3.74% |
| 14.68 | Previous day high | +2.23% |
| 14.36 | Price now | |
| 14.14 | Pivot | −1.51% |
| 13.61 | S1 (classic) | −5.25% |
| 13.39 | Previous day low | −6.75% |
| 12.85 | S2 (classic) | −10.49% |
| 12.66 | Previous week high | −11.84% |
| 12.32 | S3 (classic) | −14.23% |
| 11.89 | Previous week low | −17.20% |
| 11.89 | Previous month low | −17.20% |
| 11.89 | 52-week low | −17.20% |
None of the 29 investors followed here reported a position in DUG in their latest filing.
From each investor's quarterly 13F filing with the SEC: positions at the quarter's end, reported up to 45 days later. All investors
No member of Congress has disclosed a DUG trade since 2025.
From House and Senate STOCK Act reports. Members disclose trades, not holdings, as value ranges up to 45 days later, so amounts are estimates and “last move” is a hint at who still holds it, not a position. All recent congress trades
TimeframesUp on the hourly, down on the weekly and monthly, mixed on the daily.
over a rising 21 EMA, 21 over 50
bouncing over the 21 EMA
under a falling 21 EMA, 21 under 50
under a falling 21 EMA, 21 under 50
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -23.8 | -17.2 | -18.0 | 4.5 | 10.8 | 9.7 | -20.6 | -13.9 | 6.1 | -23.1 | 20.5 | −55.8% | |
| 2025 | -4.3 | -7.2 | -7.3 | 25.1 | -2.2 | -9.6 | -5.2 | -6.0 | -0.0 | 2.9 | -4.9 | -0.4 | −21.1% |
| 2024 | 1.2 | -5.6 | -18.2 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.4 | -3.7 | 4.7 | 4.8 | -1.6 | -13.9 | 21.0 | −11.5% |
| 2023 | -6.2 | 14.5 | -1.9 | -5.8 | 22.9 | -13.1 | -14.2 | -2.8 | -5.4 | 12.1 | 1.7 | -1.5 | −6.1% |
| 2022 | -28.7 | -14.7 | -19.4 | 1.5 | -27.5 | 35.1 | -20.3 | -8.4 | 16.9 | -36.2 | -4.4 | 6.4 | −73.1% |
| 2021 | -10.4 | -34.7 | -8.5 | -2.8 | -12.6 | -11.2 | 15.8 | 1.3 | -18.4 | -19.2 | 8.4 | -5.9 | −68.1% |
| 2020 | 26.0 | 34.0 | 50.5 | -49.0 | -10.1 | -7.4 | 5.2 | -0.2 | 32.6 | 4.0 | -45.9 | -10.9 | −24.6% |
| 2019 | -20.6 | -4.1 | -5.0 | 0.0 | 26.9 | -16.3 | 4.1 | 17.8 | -8.4 | 3.8 | -3.7 | -11.9 | −23.9% |
| 2018 | -6.7 | 22.9 | -4.7 | -17.3 | -7.2 | -2.0 | -2.5 | 5.9 | -5.2 | 26.2 | 3.6 | 29.0 | +35.7% |
| 2017 | 6.6 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 6.7 | 7.3 | 0.2 | -5.0 | 11.6 | -17.8 | 1.4 | -4.2 | -9.8 | −1.1% |
| 2016 | 2.8 | 1.8 | -18.4 | -17.1 | 1.6 | -7.2 | 3.5 | -3.5 | -7.8 | 6.8 | -17.5 | -3.6 | −47.9% |
| 2015 | 8.1 | -10.0 | 2.8 | -13.3 | 10.1 | 7.0 | 17.1 | 4.4 | 14.1 | -21.5 | -0.9 | 21.5 | +34.7% |
| 2014 | 13.1 | -10.7 | -5.3 | -9.6 | -3.2 | -10.0 | 6.9 | -5.4 | 16.6 | 5.5 | 18.6 | -2.4 | +8.4% |
| 2013 | -15.4 | -1.2 | -4.5 | 0.9 | -5.8 | 3.6 | -10.4 | 2.9 | -5.0 | -8.6 | -1.2 | -6.1 | −41.5% |
| 2012 | -4.5 | -11.9 | 6.5 | 1.3 | 23.9 | -11.8 | -8.9 | -5.5 | -7.0 | 4.0 | 1.8 | -2.4 | −17.9% |
| 2011 | -14.0 | -14.2 | -4.3 | -3.2 | 8.0 | 2.0 | -3.6 | 14.0 | 27.3 | -30.5 | -6.7 | 0.2 | −31.5% |
| 2010 | 8.6 | -5.6 | -6.2 | -9.5 | 24.6 | 9.1 | -15.3 | 7.6 | -17.8 | -10.4 | -11.6 | -16.2 | −41.3% |
| 2009 | -1.3 | 23.4 | -13.3 | -15.8 | -22.8 | 9.0 | -10.6 | -2.7 | -11.0 | -6.3 | -6.3 | -0.1 | −49.1% |
| 2008 | 24.8 | -17.6 | 4.0 | -18.9 | -7.8 | -7.3 | 32.2 | -2.0 | 12.3 | -4.6 | -17.9 | -17.6 | −30.4% |
| 2007 | -9.4 | -9.0 | -12.8 | -3.8 | -1.2 | -2.7 | -14.1 | -3.1 | 6.9 | -14.3 | −49.2% |
The index is designed to measure the performance of energy companies included in the S&P 500 Index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will obtain inverse leveraged exposure to at least 80% of its total assets in components of the index or in instruments with similar economic characteristics. The fund is non-diversified.